The optional add-on modules available from BibleWorks are all related to original language research. It contains, for example, the Juoun-Muraoka Hebrew Grammar, the Waltke and O'Connor Hebrew Syntax, and the Wallace Greek Grammar as part of its base package.
The different primary focus of each program tends to define the strengths and weaknesses of each.īibleWorks is strong in terms of the original language resources that come as part of its base package.
ACCORDANCE VS LOGOS FOR MAC
Accordance appears to be focused on trying to achieve the best of both worlds - and to do this for Mac users. Logos focuses on providing an extensive (and ever-growing) digital library to its users. BibleWorks focuses almost exclusively on the original languages of Scripture. It seems that the main fundamental difference between the three companies is in terms of their primary focus. The main difference is in the interface each uses for the searches.
All three, for example, make use of morphologically tagged Hebrew and Greek databases to enable a wide variety of simple and complex searches. In other words, all three can do most of the same things in one form or another. I don't think it would be too much of an exaggeration to say that there is probably a 90-95% overlap here. It may be helpful at this point to provide a brief summary of my thoughts on how these three compare.Īll three software programs have strong original language capabilities. I recently had the privilege of reviewing the three top Bible study software programs available today: BibleWorks, Logos, and Accordance.
0 kommentar(er)
